Symposia
Primary Care / Integrated Care
Marley F. Fradley, B.S. (she/her/hers)
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Ella Eureste (she/her/hers)
Undergraduate Student
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Joyce Ho (she/her/hers)
Undergraduate Student
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Alyssa Hartley (she/her/hers)
Undergraduate Student
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Marbely Rivas (she/her/hers)
Undergraduate Student
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Mattie Berry (she/her/hers)
Undergraduate Student
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Mia Iandolo (she/her/hers)
Undergraduate Student
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Gavin Miller (he/him/his)
Undergraduate Student
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Emily Allen, MA (she/her/hers)
Graduate Student
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Dulce Diaz Benitez, MA (she/her/hers)
Graduate Student
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Christin A. Mujica, M.A.
Graduate Student
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
Background: Integrated behavioral health is a promising solution to address gaps in mental health treatment and represents a unique opportunity to identify those at risk for developing PTSD and trauma-related consequences (Kazdin, 2017; Reiter et al., 2018). Our primary goal was to characterize and compare integrated behavioral health patients who did and did not endorse trauma.
Methods: Adult primary care patients (N = 288) referred for integrated behavioral health services completed a screener at their first visit. The screener included A Collaborative Outcome Research Framework (ACORN; Brown et al., 2015), a 14-item measure of psychiatric difficulties. ACORN items are rated from 0 (never) to 4 (very often) and scores are averaged to create a global psychiatric distress severity score. The screener also included items assessing trauma exposure and related symptoms adapted from the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5; Prins et al., 2015). Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted to characterize the sample and compare group differences. Missing data were excluded.
Results: Participants (mean age = 28.6; range = 18-86; SD = 12) were mostly White (67%), non-Latinx (73%), and female (72%). About 58% endorsed trauma exposure. Of these, 56% endorsed interpersonal trauma and 45% reported multiple traumatic events. While trauma exposure did not significantly vary across categories of race or gender, Latinx patients were significantly less likely to endorse trauma, χ2 (1, N = 286) = 7.12, p = .007. Analysis also revealed a significant association between age and trauma exposure, t(286) = 2.65, p = .008. Average age for the trauma exposed group was 30.2 years (SD = 12) versus 26.5 years (SD = 11) for those without trauma. Average ACORN scores of trauma exposed patients and patients without trauma were compared. Results indicated trauma exposure was significantly associated with increased psychiatric distress severity, t(286) = 4.63, p = .0001.
Conclusion: Findings support efforts to identify trauma and address related psychiatric distress in integrated behavioral health care settings. Given the high prevalence of trauma exposure, the associated psychiatric distress, and non-significant variance across categories of race and gender, screening efforts should be broad and inclusive of all patients.