Culture / Ethnicity / Race
Ford, B. Q., & Troy, A. S. (2019). Reappraisal reconsidered: A closer look at the costs of an acclaimed emotion-regulation strategy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419827526
Ezawa, I. D., Strunk, D. R. (2022). Differences in the delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression when therapists work with black and white patients. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 46, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-021-10254-0
Iony Ezawa, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States
Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana, United States
Dorainne Green, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Assistant professor
Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana, United States
Graham Bartels, M.S. (he/him/his)
The Ohio State University
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Robinson De Jesus-Romero, M.S. (he/him/his)
Graduate Student
Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana, United States
Cameryn Cooley, B.A. (she/her/hers)
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is among the most studied and empirically supported of the treatments for various mental health conditions (Butler et al., 2006). CBT has been shown to be effective in the short-term as compared to other bona fide treatment options as well as remain effective in the long-term past treatment completion (Hollon et al., 2006; Strunk et al., 2017). The CBT model asserts that, by teaching clients strategies to reappraise their thoughts, they can feel better as a result (Beck et al., 1979). There is accumulating empirical support for the role of such cognitive methods in predicting improvements in therapy (Ezawa & Hollon, 2023).
One serious limitation of the prior research on CBT is that this work has been conducted on largely White, educated, Western samples. This limitation has led to concerns that findings related to the processes, outcomes, and general reach of CBT may not generalize to minoritized populations. Even more concerningly, the lack of focus of minoritized populations has led some researchers and therapists alike to question whether CBT and its core strategies may be fundamentally unhelpful for minoritized populations, and if so, if CBT’s strategies can be adapted or changed to meet the need of more diverse populations. In response to these serious concerns, many research groups are now evaluating the utility and perception of CBT and its strategies with diverse populations.
This symposium offers an in-depth examination of minoritized individuals' perceptions of treatments, treatment strategies, and the use of strategies in various contexts. Our first talk involves findings on the association between experiences of discrimination and the use of reappraisal and suppression strategies, along with how this relationship may be mediated by self-control and emotion regulation. Our second talk reports findings on participant preferences for therapists’ use of cognitive restructuring, validation, and hybrid cognitive/validation strategies in vignettes with varying levels of discrimination among participants with diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds currently endorsing depressive symptoms. Our third talk reviews results of a study comparing the efficacy of reappraisal strategies and experiencing emotions naturally for clients with sexual minority identities experiencing depression in vignettes that either did or did not simulate identity-based stress. Our fourth talk discusses findings on three interventions focused on increasing treatment-seeking rates, examining how often both Black and White participants with depression ended up seeking treatment. Our discussant, an expert on CBT interventions and processes of change in psychotherapy, will synthesize the findings presented and discuss their implications.
Speaker: Dorainne Green, Ph.D. (she/her/hers) – Indiana University
Co-author: Trinity Barnes, None – Indiana University
Co-author: Neelamberi Klein, M.S. – Indiana University
Speaker: Graham C. Bartels, M.S. (he/him/his) – The Ohio State University
Co-author: Iony D. Ezawa, Ph.D. (she/her/hers) – University of Southern California
Speaker: Robinson De Jesus-Romero, M.S. (he/him/his) – Indiana University
Co-author: Lorenzo Lorenzo-Luaces, Ph.D. – Indiana University
Co-author: Dorainne Green, Ph.D. (she/her/hers) – Indiana University
Speaker: Cameryn A. Cooley, B.A. (she/her/hers) – The Ohio State University
Co-author: Kassidie S. Harmon, M.S. – The Ohio State University
Co-author: Jennifer S. Cheavens, Ph.D. (she/her/hers) – The Ohio State University