Technology/Digital Health
Valerie Swisher, B.S. (she/her/hers)
The Pennsylvania State University
Diamond Bar, California, United States
Michelle Newman, B.S., M.A., Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Professor
The Pennsylvania State University
State College, Pennsylvania, United States
Valerie Swisher, B.S. (she/her/hers)
The Pennsylvania State University
Diamond Bar, California, United States
Adam Calderon, B.S., M.A.
The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, Pennsylvania, United States
Nur Hani Zainal, M.S., Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor
National University of Singapore
Kent Ridge, Singapore
Kaitlyn Petz, B.A. (she/her/hers)
Project Coordinator
University of Virginia
Eatontown, New Jersey, United States
Technological-based assessments and interventions have emerged as promising and more scalable alternatives to traditional retrospective self-report and therapeutic methods. As up to 70% of those experiencing mental health symptoms worldwide do not receive treatment (Thornicroft, 2007), technological-based assessments and interventions are needed to increase the accessibility and dissemination of psychological services.
One such technologically based assessment is ecological momentary assessment (EMA), which functions to address limitations in cross-sectional research by providing temporally sensitive, multimodal, context-specific, interactive, and generalizable assessment (Ebner-Priemer & Trull, 2009). As EMA provides insight into time-contingent aspects of conditions (e.g., examining activity level in depression based on time of day), EMA studies can be effectively translated to inform ecological momentary interventions (EMI). With the exponential increase in access to mobile devices worldwide, EMI interventions offer an accessible and scalable way to decrease the burden of mental illness (Kazdin et al., 2011).
While recent advancements of EMA and EMI show promise, it is important to consider individual differences and tailor these methods to address the needs of diverse populations. Indeed, while EMA and EMI have been applied to a variety of populations, not all EMI interventions will work well for everybody, and it is not yet clear how to mitigate participation barriers and improve treatment responsiveness in minoritized groups (Kennedy-Malone et al., 2022; Heron & Smyth, 2011). Machine learning (ML) algorithms are one novel approach to inform treatment decisions and provide personalized treatment recommendations (Dwyer et al., 2018), and can be used to examine differential benefits to EMI interventions (Zainal & Newman, 2024).
Therefore, the research in this symposium will (a) discuss the application of EMA techniques to study mechanisms of psychological conditions; (b) examine the use of ML to predict differential treatment responsiveness to an EMI; and (c) discuss the application of an EMI to meet the needs of marginalized communities when they face discrimination.
Speaker: Valerie S. Swisher, B.S. (she/her/hers) – The Pennsylvania State University
Co-author: Michelle G. Newman, B.S., M.A., Ph.D. (she/her/hers) – The Pennsylvania State University
Speaker: Adam Calderon, B.S., M.A. – The Pennsylvania State University
Co-author: Michelle G. Newman, B.S., M.A., Ph.D. (she/her/hers) – The Pennsylvania State University
Speaker: Nur Hani Zainal, M.S., Ph.D. (she/her/hers) – National University of Singapore
Co-author: Michelle G. Newman, B.S., M.A., Ph.D. (she/her/hers) – The Pennsylvania State University
Speaker: Kaitlyn Petz, B.A. (she/her/hers) – University of Virginia
Co-author: Kaitlyn Petz, B.A. (she/her/hers) – University of Virginia
Co-author: Emma R. Toner, M.A. – University of Virginia
Co-author: Mark Rucker, M.S. – University of Virginia
Co-author: Emily Leventhal, B.A. – Icahn School of Medicine
Co-author: Sarah Livermon, B.S. – University of Virginia
Co-author: Benjamin Davidson, B.S. – University of Virginia
Co-author: Mehdi Boukhechba, Ph.D. – Johnson & Johnson
Co-author: Laura Barnes, PhD – University of Virginia
Co-author: Bethany Teachman, Ph.D. – University of Virginia