Workforce Development / Training / Supervision
Cummings, J. A., Ballantyne, E. C., & Scallion, L. M. (2015). Essential processes for cognitive behavioral clinical supervision: Agenda setting, problem-solving, and formative feedback. Psychotherapy, 52(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038712
,Weisz, J. R., Ugueto, A. M., Cheron, D. M., & Herren, J. (2013). Evidence-based youth psychotherapy in the mental health ecosystem. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 42(2), 274-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.764824
, Milne, D. L. & Reiser, R. P. (2017). A manual for evidence-based CBT supervision. John Wiley & Sons.,Mark Terjesen, Ph.D.
St. John’s University
Queens, New York, United States
Tamara Del Vecchio, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
St. John’s University
Queens, New York, United States
Mark Terjesen, Ph.D.
St. John’s University
Queens, New York, United States
Rachel Vaughn, Psy.D. (she/her/hers)
St. John’s University
Woodside, New York, United States
David Reitman, Ph.D. (he/him/his)
Nova Southeastern Unjversity
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Clinical supervision plays a key role in developing clinical skills and knowledge for psychotherapists in training (Milne, 2009) and is a primary mechanism by which trainees attain and maintain competency (Bernard & Goodyear, 2013). The American Psychological Association (APA) released guidelines for Clinical Supervision in Health Service Psychology in 2015 to promote the quality of supervision in health service psychology. While CBT is the primary theoretical orientation of most mental health providers (Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2018), inconsistencies in CBT supervision training have been reported (Milne, 2016). Theoretically, clinical supervision in CBT was intended to be a systematic and direct extension of CBT (Beck, 1997; Padesky, 1996) and evolving standards for evidence-based supervision increasingly incorporate agendas, goal setting, homework, feedback, and problem-solving (Cummings et al., 2015).The symposium will explore these emerging standards for evidence-based supervision and evaluate current supervision training practices in relation to these ideals. The first presenters will review syllabi from APA-approved graduate training programs, addressing the process and content of graduate supervision training in relation to emerging standards for clinical supervision. Particular attention will be paid to areas of supervision pertinent to clinical work with families and youth. The second presentation will provide an analysis of promising training outcomes from a recently developed supervision training program. The third presenter will examine how recent meta-analyses of community-based care for youth and families might affect the content of clinical supervision (what is taught) for trainees conducting family-based, youth-focused interventions.
Speaker: Mark Terjesen, Ph.D. – St. John’s University
Co-author: Sarah Quintal, BA – St Johns University
Co-author: Genesis Tolentino, BA – St Johns University
Co-author: Meghan Skakandi, BA – St Johns University
Co-author: Saqib Rahman, BA – St Johns University
Speaker: Rachel Vaughn, Psy.D. (she/her/hers) – St. John’s University
Co-author: Olivia A. Walsh, M.S. – St. John’s University
Speaker: David Reitman, Ph.D. (he/him/his) – Nova Southeastern Unjversity