Symposia
Couples / Close Relationships
Allison L. Tobar-Santamaria, B.S., B.A. (she/her/hers)
Graduate Research Assistant
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Blacksburg, Virginia, United States
Zachary Hubshman, Student
Student
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, Virginia, United States
Meagan J. Brem, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Virginia Tech
christiansburg, Virginia, United States
Extant daily studies have largely neglected a population at elevated risk of alcohol use and intimate partner violence (IPV; psychological, physical, and sexual aggression): bisexual and multigender-attracted (bi+) young couples. Theoretically-informed daily experiences that may potentiate (e.g., bi+ minority stress) or mitigate (e.g., partner support) alcohol-related IPV remain unexamined, thereby hindering bi+ IPV intervention development. This pilot study examined the feasibility and acceptability of assessing daily minority stress (e.g., bi+ specific stressors), alcohol use, and IPV perpetration/victimization among bi+ couples (i.e., couples with ≥1 bi+ partner). We hypothesized that a dyadic daily diary approach would be feasible and acceptable with >70% daily survey compliance, no adverse events, adequate variability in daily variables, and high procedural acceptability.
Following a baseline survey, 15 couples (N = 30 individuals) completed 60 consecutive days of surveys on alcohol use, IPV, minority stress, and partner support followed by an exit survey; data collection is ongoing. Eligibility: both partners must be 18-30 years old, be in a relationship with each other for ≥1 month, have consumed alcohol in the past month, and must see each other ≥twice per week. At least 1 partner must identify as bi+ and ≥1 partner must report past-3-month heavy episodic drinking (i.e., 4+/5+ drinks per sitting).
Results support the feasibility/acceptability of the dyadic daily diary approach among bi+ couples as evidenced by 81% compliance with daily surveys, no adverse events/participant withdrawal, and high acceptability (i.e., 90% of participants were “mostly” or “very” satisfied with study procedures). Daily data revealed a wide range of variability in daily variables. All participants consumed alcohol at least once during the study (M drinks on a drinking day = 3.60, SD = 3.12). Most (93%) daily surveys included at least 1 minority stressor, and 73.3% of participants reported ≥1 IPV incident during the study. Partner support varied across days and dyads. Across all days, average partner support was high (83.80; SD = 20.05), though low levels of partner support were reported on 8% of daily surveys and among 53% of participants.
Preliminary results suggest that the dyadic daily diary approach is a feasible and acceptable method for assessing alcohol use, IPV, minority stress, and partner support among heavy drinking bi+ couples. Results have implications for future development of couple-level just-in-time IPV interventions.