Autism Spectrum and Developmental Disorders
Predictors of engagement and retention in an adapted CBT program: Facing Your Fears-Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Jenna Eilenberg, M.P.H., M.A.
Psychology Intern
University of Colorado, School of Medicine
Denver, Colorado, United States
Judy Reaven, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychiatry and Pediatrics
JFK Partners, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Denver, Colorado, United States
Allison Meyer, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Shadi Sharif, B.A.
Clinical Research Coordinator
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Elizabeth Glenn, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Kelly Cosgrove, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow
University of Colorado, School of Medicine
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Audrey Blakeley-Smith, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Denver, Colorado, United States
Introduction: Autistic adolescents with intellectual disability (ID) experience high rates of anxiety, which has significant negative impacts on daily life for the individual and their family (Winch et al., 2022). Very few evidence-based mental health interventions exist for this population. Facing Your Fears: Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (FYF:IDD) is a 14-week CBT group treatment designed to reduce anxiety among autistic adolescents with ID ages 12-18 years old. The efficacy of the program is being examined via an RCT where participants are randomized to either FYF:IDD or a waitlist comparison. Given that a 14-week clinic-based intervention can pose a challenge for already stressed families, the objective of this study is to examine factors that impact engagement and retention of the intended target population in the FYF:IDD program. Findings from this analysis will inform next steps of intervention development to ensure optimal access for families who may benefit from the intervention.
Methods: Regression analyses were used to identify significant predictors of treatment dropout, completion, and session attendance. Hypothesized predictors included demographic characteristics, medical complexity of the teen (Pediatric Medical Complexity Algorithm), challenging behaviors (Aberrant Behavior Checklist), parent burnout (Parent Burnout Assessment), and travel distance to the clinic. All analyses controlled for treatment cohort and treatment condition.
Results: Fifty-one families (79% White, 6% Black, 15% multiple races; 24% Latinx) completed at least one session of FYF:IDD. Six families (67% White, 33% Asian; 33% Latinx) dropped out of the study prior to starting treatment. Of the families who completed at least one session, the average number of sessions completed was 10.35 (SD = 4.09) and 67% completed a full course (attended ≥11 of the 14 sessions). Married parents were significantly more likely to attend a greater number of sessions (β= 0.402; p-value=0.002) and to complete a full course (Exp(β)=6.365; p-value=.008), compared to single parents. Being in the waitlist comparison group was significantly associated with dropout prior to starting FYF:IDD (Exp(β)=33.260; p-value=.017), compared to being in the intervention group. None of the other hypothesized predictors significantly predicted participant retention.
Discussion: In this sample, autistic adolescents with ID from married-parent households were more likely to consistently attend an anxiety CBT program than those from single-parent households. In the context of a population with high medical and developmental needs, parent partnership seems to drive differences in participation rates regardless of complexity of the teen’s presentation. Parents of autistic youth with ID often report high levels of parenting stress; however, sharing the caregiving role with a partner may buffer against stress and enhance family participation in interventions (Norlin and Broberg, 2013). Future implementation of FYF:IDD should consider adjusting treatment duration, strategies to accommodate the needs of single-parent families, and intervention delivery in settings that may reduce parent burden (e.g., school- and transition-based settings).